Orthorexia Nervosa has moved from internet buzzword to a construct with real clinical texture, and recent research clarifies both why it's spreading and how to treat it well.
Awad et al. (2026) show how social media architecture (not just individual vulnerability) feeds the preoccupation with "clean" eating, which this talk uses to explain why orthorexic thinking is showing up earlier and more often in clinical intake.
Sanseverino, Guidotti, and Pruneti (2025) and Eckley et al. (2025) establish how common and how variable these presentations are across populations, grounding the case for why clinicians can't rely on informal impression alone to spot it.
The diagnostic core of the talk rests on Lombardo et al.'s (2026) network analysis, which maps where orthorexic symptoms overlap with OCD versus eating-disorder symptoms and where they run independently, giving clinicians a structural, not just descriptive, way to differentiate the three.
Moccia et al.'s (2025) meta-analytic synthesis pulls that evidence together into treatment-relevant conclusions, which anchors the segment on what actually changes orthorexic behavior versus what merely manages it.
Guzik et al.'s review of diagnostic and treatment challenges closes the loop, framing the talk's final section: a concrete, ERP- and CBT-based protocol clinicians can start using immediately, built on where the field's diagnostic uncertainty still leaves room for clinical judgment.
*This is a live, interactive webinar course that will take place on April 23, 2027 at 10am EST. It will be recorded and made available as a self-paced, video-based, on-demand course.
Registration deadline: April 23, 2027, 9:30am